| Paul Denlinger Wants To See How Many Ways We Can Get This Wrong |
|
|
|
|
Paul's article Let's See How Many Ways We Can Get This Wrong offers a perspective that helps give insight that is being overlooked and prompted Christine Lu to gather a bit more insight from him.
CHRISTINE: Paul, in your most recent post Let's See How Many Ways We Can Get This Wrong you talk about how immediate reaction in the US to China ordering entertainment websites to shutdown for 3 days was misunderstood. Although you express frustration, you don't seem surprised either by the reaction of key social media figures such as Robert Scoble. What are some key points you're hoping that people take away from your most recent post? PAUL: The edict came across as heavy-handed in English, but in its original Chinese, it was framed more as a recommendation. Of course, recommendations from the central government in time of crisis carry a lot of weight and business owners have to take responsibility for any possible repercussions of their decisions. When it got into English, it somehow became an order or edict, which fit into Robert Scoble's stereotype of China's government as being authoritarian. Robert's wife is Iranian and left post-revolutionary Iran, and he probably thinks that the Chinese government is somehow similar to Iran's. The problem with Robert's point of view is that once Americans stamp a government as "authoritarian", they equate that with being evil, and shut the door to learning more about it, or considering that it may evolve and become more open. And once it is considered authoritarian, they think that everything it does and says has to be interpreted as being manipulative and PR spin. Most absolutely reject the idea that it can reform and become something even remotely democratic, which is why you get so many ignorant remarks in the Friendfeed discussion thread. So, even though China is changing rapidly, their views of China are essentially locked in the freezer and become more and more dated. Then just add that most of them don't come to China to learn more about the people, and you have the formula for some really silly ideas about China. CHRISTINE: As we know, it takes years of living and working in China to understand things from the Chinese perspective - especially when it comes to understanding the Chinese government's reasoning for initiatives such as this one. Playing a bit of devil's advocate here, can you really blame westerner reaction to these initiatives? How else are they supposed to see the situation other than a negative move? What are the first steps towards seeing China through the eyes of the Chinese, when you're not Chinese to begin with? PAUL: The first thing is to realize that about 90% of what the US media says about China is framed in political terms, and in terms of China's rise and how it will affect the US's international position. It's important to realize that this is a political issue only, and it takes time to establish political and social context so that you understand the government's rationale for what is going on. The important thing to realize is that with 30 years of reforms and opening up, the Chinese government has unleashed forces it cannot completely control, but can only hope to channel in ways they would like. Economic reformers in the Chinese government have a saying: "If China reforms too quickly, society will become chaotic, and if it reforms too slowly, the government will perish." The government needs to stay one step ahead of what the people want in order to survive. But sometimes, you get officials who still try to do things the way they used to in their good old days, and that is why you get clumsiness with media-related and other issues.
CHRISTINE: For the person reading this on The China Business Network and is new to China but obviously wants to learn more, what are some key points of advice you have for them to avoid falling into the "FriendFeed" critical frenzy prompted by this recent announcement by the Chinese government? CHRISTINE: On a side note, it seems that social media apps such as Twitter and FriendFeed have begun to play a role in closing the cultural gap. Would you agree? How effective a tool is Twitter and FriendFeed for you these days? PAUL: They drastically cut down the time news and opinions get spread around. It means that you really have to react much faster. But it also means that you have to think through what you are going to say faster, and present it in a coherent manner. The downside is that some people act like kids with ADD and can sometimes say silly things, then switch to another whole new issue the next day, completely forgetting the previous discussion. Paul's full post on this issue can be found at his China Vortex blog post titled Let’s See How Many Ways We Can Get This Wrong About Paul DenlingerPaul Denlinger's life reads like a Who Is Who of business in China. As a senior manager he worked in the past two decades both Chinese and Western companies with sounding names like Shanda, Unilever, Philips, TSMC, Acer, Walt Disney, McDonald's, BMW and even the state-owned newswire Xinhua is on his reference list. You can follow Paul on Twitter as pdenlinger.
Please Enter New Tags Separated By Comma's
Or Close |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|